Post by Chelsbot on Jul 9, 2008 21:08:27 GMT -5
First vote, cast by Eddie, goes to...
Reason: "I vote for Jason to win Big Brother Warzone. Big surprise, I know."
Janelle cast her vote for...
Reason: "Well I have to leave now so I will just give you who I vote for. I am voting for [GAYCHEL] to win *giggles*"
Jessica voted for...
Reason: "Because.. he did push for me to play this game in the first place.. so we have had an unspoken alliance the entire game. I feel he has played a great game and the key to playing a good game is to get your threats out but at the same time not piss them off and I feel Jason did a better job of that. I also feel that what I asked both of them to do was be honest in their answers.. I feel that Rachel was not completly honest in her answers. Also if she ever wanted my vote she should not have straight out told me privately to not vote for her, that she does not want my vote. I guess she was trying to manipulate me and use reverse psychology.. sorry that shit does not work on me. I also feel it was not cool of her to bring up past games in her jury answers. I thought that was very rude and uncalled for. Plus it wasn't even true what she said, we did not play those games the same at all, you can't even compare our games. I do not know why she keeps calling me a hypocrite, the fact that she was the host of the game she's bashing me in and then using those powers to bash me in this game, is all disrespectful to me. It would be different if she was saying that stuff as a player from that game.. but the fact that she was the host.. I personally would never use information I gather from watching someone in one of my games to bash someone in a game I'm in with them, that's just low. But that game was also sooo long ago.. why bring it up now, what does a survivor game that you hosted and I won, have to do with a BB game that is almost a year later? I'll never know. Jason for the win!!! <3"
Chelsia cast her vote for...
Reason: "You played my kinda game from day one. I loved what I saw from you, and just when I thought you might not be here to play ya totally shock me by going on one massive run. I mean I knew you were working all the angles before you started your run of madness. But that really opened my eyes to your game play this season. You were straight up social, you knew the game very very well, also rippin' up them challenges has shown me that you are a TRIPLE THREAT. I think that deserves to win over anything that Jason threw at us. I mean you are one hell of a good friend, but that is NOT why I am casting this vote at all. You simply out played us and deserve credit by winning it all. I really, truly hope this jury loses a bit of the bitterness before they come in here and cast that vote. As you truly played harder and better than Jason. I give him his credit towards the end, but I give you your credit through this game, as you never stopped playing at all. I love da hell out choo and I pray to God you win comma. Best of luck in this, and break a leg. *Stares*"
Will voted for...
Reason: "I have really put a lot of thought into this vote. I realize that I could very easily be the deciding vote. I think they both played great games. Two very different styles but both worked equally as good. My job here is to determine which one was better.
Rachel played a really tough game. She certainly wasn't under the radar and became a huge target pretty early. A lot of things could have happened that could have easily put her on the jury but unfortunately for everyone else, Rachel and her allies won like 95% of the HOH competition and Veto's. Had someone from outside her alliance won HOH and or the veto she could have easily been out in 9th or 8th. I think she put herself in a dangerous position where a smarter player would not have.
There was one important thing I needed to know and her answer to my second question gave me what I needed to know. According to Rachel there were several people willing to take out Dave and would actually go through with this brilliant plan she came up with where she at first denies and then now wants credit for. In my opinion a smarter player would have gotten someone else to do it and she would have avoided that whole mess which made her almost as big of a target as Janelle. But since Janelle had her power Rachel was the easier target to get rid of. Had she told me no one was willing to do it..and she was the only one that would actually do it and it needed to be done, then she would have had my vote. But the way I see it is she put herself in a bad spot.
Jason on the other hand probably would have still skated by had someone from outside their alliance won. Jason was viewed as a complete non threat and he wasn't in as dangerous of a position as Rachel. Jason earned my respect when he won those challenges at the end when he needed to. Jason proved to me he knew what he was doing and he didn't just get lucky.
Also I still kind of have a problem with the fact Rachel, Janelle and Chelsia joined this game together. Rachel...maybe next time try playing without your friends and maybe you will win."
Next vote, cast by Dave, goes to...
Reason: "Rachel was playing this game from the beginning. I don't care what my jury question was, because it was just meant to see what kind of response I could get. Rachel wasn't afraid to make enemies, and she obviously showed how hard she was playing. I even think that she knew my vote was still up in the air, which is why she picked me as the number 1 best player for one of the jury questions. Rachel knows what she needs to do to win, and she's not afraid to do it. She'll lie, cheat, steal (well, essentially), and she's in it to win it. If I am losing to someone, I'd want it to be her. Plus, who else could pull of a backdoor of me, the REAL best player here.
Congrats Rachel, you deserve the win! 
Jason, you played a good game, but I just think that Rachel was more involved than you. I know that you did a lot to get where you were, but I think that she had a more active role in her getting to the final 2. I feel bad because you have shared that you get to the final 2 and then always lose. If you win, I won't be upset. You deserve to win too. Regardless of who wins, I will walk away with multiple friends. Best of luck in future games, and I hope to see you around.
Congrats both of you for doing so well. Whoever gets 2nd place should be proud because this was one crazy group of cut-throat people. Thanks for a great game, everyone! And thanks, Chels, for hosting!!! It's been the best ORG that I have played in... HANDS DOWN! ;D"
3 to 3, James' vote will determine the winner.
And it goes to...
Reason: "Well, I think that Rachel played a great game from the very beginning. She may have had a pre-formed alliance, but she also formed new ones. This allowed her to never be nominated for eviction. Had she come into this game alone, I still feel that she would have made it to the final two.
Jason played a good game, however, the only reason he even made it to the jury stages of the game was because of his pre-formed alliances. If Janelle, Chelsia, and Rachel were not alligned to him, he would have left pre-jury! Although he did step up his game after the jury, it is nothing compared to Rachel's game play during the whole game!
So with that, my final vote goes to
Rachel! ;D
Played hard right from the beginning and definetly deserves the win more than anyone! If she loses then the jury was definitely bitter! Well in my opinion at least!
Best of luck, and good game Chels!
"
Congratulations, Rachel, by a vote of 4-3, you are the winner of BIG BROTHER: WARZONE! [/color]
Reason: "I vote for Jason to win Big Brother Warzone. Big surprise, I know."
Janelle cast her vote for...
Reason: "Well I have to leave now so I will just give you who I vote for. I am voting for [GAYCHEL] to win *giggles*"
Jessica voted for...
Reason: "Because.. he did push for me to play this game in the first place.. so we have had an unspoken alliance the entire game. I feel he has played a great game and the key to playing a good game is to get your threats out but at the same time not piss them off and I feel Jason did a better job of that. I also feel that what I asked both of them to do was be honest in their answers.. I feel that Rachel was not completly honest in her answers. Also if she ever wanted my vote she should not have straight out told me privately to not vote for her, that she does not want my vote. I guess she was trying to manipulate me and use reverse psychology.. sorry that shit does not work on me. I also feel it was not cool of her to bring up past games in her jury answers. I thought that was very rude and uncalled for. Plus it wasn't even true what she said, we did not play those games the same at all, you can't even compare our games. I do not know why she keeps calling me a hypocrite, the fact that she was the host of the game she's bashing me in and then using those powers to bash me in this game, is all disrespectful to me. It would be different if she was saying that stuff as a player from that game.. but the fact that she was the host.. I personally would never use information I gather from watching someone in one of my games to bash someone in a game I'm in with them, that's just low. But that game was also sooo long ago.. why bring it up now, what does a survivor game that you hosted and I won, have to do with a BB game that is almost a year later? I'll never know. Jason for the win!!! <3"
Chelsia cast her vote for...
Reason: "You played my kinda game from day one. I loved what I saw from you, and just when I thought you might not be here to play ya totally shock me by going on one massive run. I mean I knew you were working all the angles before you started your run of madness. But that really opened my eyes to your game play this season. You were straight up social, you knew the game very very well, also rippin' up them challenges has shown me that you are a TRIPLE THREAT. I think that deserves to win over anything that Jason threw at us. I mean you are one hell of a good friend, but that is NOT why I am casting this vote at all. You simply out played us and deserve credit by winning it all. I really, truly hope this jury loses a bit of the bitterness before they come in here and cast that vote. As you truly played harder and better than Jason. I give him his credit towards the end, but I give you your credit through this game, as you never stopped playing at all. I love da hell out choo and I pray to God you win comma. Best of luck in this, and break a leg. *Stares*"
Will voted for...
Reason: "I have really put a lot of thought into this vote. I realize that I could very easily be the deciding vote. I think they both played great games. Two very different styles but both worked equally as good. My job here is to determine which one was better.
Rachel played a really tough game. She certainly wasn't under the radar and became a huge target pretty early. A lot of things could have happened that could have easily put her on the jury but unfortunately for everyone else, Rachel and her allies won like 95% of the HOH competition and Veto's. Had someone from outside her alliance won HOH and or the veto she could have easily been out in 9th or 8th. I think she put herself in a dangerous position where a smarter player would not have.
There was one important thing I needed to know and her answer to my second question gave me what I needed to know. According to Rachel there were several people willing to take out Dave and would actually go through with this brilliant plan she came up with where she at first denies and then now wants credit for. In my opinion a smarter player would have gotten someone else to do it and she would have avoided that whole mess which made her almost as big of a target as Janelle. But since Janelle had her power Rachel was the easier target to get rid of. Had she told me no one was willing to do it..and she was the only one that would actually do it and it needed to be done, then she would have had my vote. But the way I see it is she put herself in a bad spot.
Jason on the other hand probably would have still skated by had someone from outside their alliance won. Jason was viewed as a complete non threat and he wasn't in as dangerous of a position as Rachel. Jason earned my respect when he won those challenges at the end when he needed to. Jason proved to me he knew what he was doing and he didn't just get lucky.
Also I still kind of have a problem with the fact Rachel, Janelle and Chelsia joined this game together. Rachel...maybe next time try playing without your friends and maybe you will win."
Next vote, cast by Dave, goes to...
Reason: "Rachel was playing this game from the beginning. I don't care what my jury question was, because it was just meant to see what kind of response I could get. Rachel wasn't afraid to make enemies, and she obviously showed how hard she was playing. I even think that she knew my vote was still up in the air, which is why she picked me as the number 1 best player for one of the jury questions. Rachel knows what she needs to do to win, and she's not afraid to do it. She'll lie, cheat, steal (well, essentially), and she's in it to win it. If I am losing to someone, I'd want it to be her. Plus, who else could pull of a backdoor of me, the REAL best player here.
Congrats Rachel, you deserve the win! 
Jason, you played a good game, but I just think that Rachel was more involved than you. I know that you did a lot to get where you were, but I think that she had a more active role in her getting to the final 2. I feel bad because you have shared that you get to the final 2 and then always lose. If you win, I won't be upset. You deserve to win too. Regardless of who wins, I will walk away with multiple friends. Best of luck in future games, and I hope to see you around.
Congrats both of you for doing so well. Whoever gets 2nd place should be proud because this was one crazy group of cut-throat people. Thanks for a great game, everyone! And thanks, Chels, for hosting!!! It's been the best ORG that I have played in... HANDS DOWN! ;D"
3 to 3, James' vote will determine the winner.
And it goes to...
Reason: "Well, I think that Rachel played a great game from the very beginning. She may have had a pre-formed alliance, but she also formed new ones. This allowed her to never be nominated for eviction. Had she come into this game alone, I still feel that she would have made it to the final two.
Jason played a good game, however, the only reason he even made it to the jury stages of the game was because of his pre-formed alliances. If Janelle, Chelsia, and Rachel were not alligned to him, he would have left pre-jury! Although he did step up his game after the jury, it is nothing compared to Rachel's game play during the whole game!
So with that, my final vote goes to
Rachel! ;D
Played hard right from the beginning and definetly deserves the win more than anyone! If she loses then the jury was definitely bitter! Well in my opinion at least!
Best of luck, and good game Chels!
"Congratulations, Rachel, by a vote of 4-3, you are the winner of BIG BROTHER: WARZONE! [/color]
