|
Post by Chelsia Hart on Jul 6, 2008 17:34:35 GMT -5
He only did what he did ta you because Rachel played it up well with him. I know for a fact he was leaning towards voting James out for weeks upon that. It was Rachels relationship with James, and the moves she made on Jason that took you outta this game. Thats no lie at all^ Also the fact that Rachel was sooo many peoples targets week after week shows she was playign the game harder and quite better than Jasons under the dar, Floating game he was playing. I mean you are in titled to whatever you feel happened. But don't let Jason fool you into thinking he had the plan of booting you out all laid out, as he didn't. in fact he never had anything laid out in advanced, he barely had time to get on and be apart of the layout half the time. I mean he didnt even vote week 3 or whatever. Friendships laid aside for me, Rachel played the better game. I really wish people could put feelings aside and just look at game play. But not all of us vote based on game play so its understandable. I however have looked at both games over and over. I too don't need to look at the jury questions as one said^ I played to the final 3 with the two of them and I was around both their games to the very last second. I would say I was very involved in their games as well. I don't care about any of that. I wanna read these closing statements and Ima' go vote for the very well played game that Rachel played.
|
|
|
Post by Jessica Hughbanks on Jul 6, 2008 19:15:07 GMT -5
excuse me.. why do you assume that Rachel is the one to take all the credit for the Will leaving over James??? The only reason Will left over James is because Eddie didn't vote, end of story. I personally voted for Will to go over James.. due to the fact that I'm closer to James than Will and that's the same reason Rachel voted that way. Not that anyone cares.. but Jason did talk over the shit he was going to do with me before actually doing it, the only move I was annoyed with that he did was the one where he played emotionally instead of doing a move he should have. But don't let the emotional aspect turn you away from voting him.. since Rachel's game was ALL emotional based.
|
|
|
Post by Eddie McGee on Jul 6, 2008 19:30:06 GMT -5
Too lazy...to read...ESSAYS on who played Big Brother Warzone better.
I skimmed some shit and our arguments are starting to wane in entertainment and shock value.
It's time to vote.
|
|
|
Post by Will Kirby on Jul 7, 2008 11:41:50 GMT -5
I think they both played very well. Two very different styles but both equally effective since they are the last 2 people standing.
I think Jason deserves more credit then Rachel wants to give him. For the longest time I thought Jason was just lucky to get as far as he did but I think there is alot more to it then that.
The one flaw in Rachels game I can see is if someone other then her or someone in her alliance had won HOH near the middle to end of the game Rachel would not still be in the game. Your right Chelsia..she was everyones target and I see that as bad game play. She was an HOh and veto loss away from being evicted. Jason on the other hand would have survived if the "other side" managed to win HOH.
|
|
|
Post by Will Kirby on Jul 7, 2008 11:53:00 GMT -5
Im talking about the middle of the game and not the end. I realize that anything can happen at the end with so few people. But around the final 9 and final 8. If I won HOH I know I was going after her hardcore. I think Eddie was too
|
|
|
Post by Jason Guy on Jul 10, 2008 12:37:14 GMT -5
Eddie, I am going to stick to my word.. for sure! This made me feel so warm inside. ^____^
|
|
|
Post by Eddie McGee on Jul 10, 2008 13:11:31 GMT -5
LOL yeah. It smelled like bullshit so I had to ask.
|
|
|
Post by Dave Lane on Jul 11, 2008 0:18:28 GMT -5
LOL yeah. It smelled like bullshit so I had to ask. Lol. I had to deal bullshit at this point. I didn't want anybody knowing that my vote was truly up in the air. Good call though Eddie. You saw right through my crap... lol.
|
|